Cryptonomen
Editorial and Source Methodology
Exact identities, attributable sources and clear distinctions guide our public records.
Sources and identities
Public records draw on identified primary authority material. We retain the exact entity, domain or profile where supplied, source authority, jurisdiction and available dates. A genuine firm and a warned clone must not be conflated. Missing domains are not guessed from names.
What a record establishes
A warning is attributed to its issuing source and interpreted within its scope. It does not automatically prove client complaints, blocked withdrawals, wallet activity or a recovery result. Company-attested experience, supplied client material and independent records require distinct attribution.
Dates and review
Source-event, registry validation and modification dates are labelled separately from this website’s actual publication date. Retaining a source library does not mean every linked notice was freshly read at the same time. Records with unresolved identity or date conflicts are held from the eligible publication queue.
Corrections and relationships
Substantive factual concerns are reviewed against relevant evidence. Affiliated publisher brands are excluded as accused subjects in our source-library workflow. Any recommendation involving an affiliation should disclose the relationship next to the link. Request a correction.